Identifies and describes validity issues for mixed methods research using participatory GIS. Defines and operationalizes validity concepts for mixed methods research. Applies mixed methods validity concepts to a participatory GIS how to use qualitative methods in evaluation pdf in Australia. Discusses implications for use of mixed methods in participatory GIS research.
Participatory mapping in social research is characterized by methodological pluralism, with two common methods being qualitative mapping using stakeholder interviews and quantitative methods that engage larger public samples through digital, internet mapping. To date, there has been no systematic evaluation of the extent to which mixed methods in participatory mapping yield valid results when applied to the same research setting and research questions. We found that qualitative and quantitative methods resulted in moderate to high concurrent validity when assessing the importance of place values in the study area. Aboriginal culture values, and weakest with existence, therapeutic, and commercial fishing values. Check if you have access through your login credentials or your institution. Complementarity of research paradigms is possible and needed.
Sequential transformative mixed methods produce robust and meaningful results. Quantitative and qualitative approaches to planning and evaluation in education for sustainable development have often been treated by practitioners from a single research paradigm. This paper discusses the utility of mixed method evaluation designs which integrate qualitative and quantitative data through a sequential transformative process. Sequential mixed method data collection strategies involve collecting data in an iterative process whereby data collected in one phase contribute to data collected in the next. A European Commission Tempus-funded Programme’.