This article has multiple science and society book pdf. STS emerged from the confluence of a variety of disciplines and disciplinary subfields, all of which had developed an interest—typically, during the 1960s or 1970s—in viewing science and technology as socially embedded enterprises. By 2011, 111 STS research centres and academic programs were counted worldwide.
In the mid- to late-1960s, student and faculty social movements in the U. One such development was the rise of “science, technology, and society” programs, which are also—confusingly—known by the STS acronym. 1970s from the same concerns that motivated the founders of the science, technology, and society movement: A sense that science and technology were developing in ways that were increasingly at odds with the public’s best interests. The science, technology, and society movement tried to humanize those who would make tomorrow’s science and technology, but this discipline took a different approach: It would train students with the professional skills needed to become players in science and technology policy. Others emphasized sociological and qualitative approaches, and found that their closest kin could be found among scholars in science, technology, and society departments. During the 1970s and 1980s, leading universities in the US, UK, and Europe began drawing these various components together in new, interdisciplinary programs.
For example, in the 1970s, Cornell University developed a new program that united science studies and policy-oriented scholars with historians and philosophers of science and technology. Each of these programs developed unique identities due to variation in the components that were drawn together, as well as their location within the various universities. A decisive moment in the development of STS was the mid-1980s addition of technology studies to the range of interests reflected in science. Sociology of Scientific Knowledge to this development by showing how the sociology of technology could proceed along precisely the theoretical and methodological lines established by the sociology of scientific knowledge.
This was the intellectual foundation of the field they called the social construction of technology. The “turn to technology” helped to cement an already growing awareness of underlying unity among the various emerging STS programs. The subject has several professional associations. The society has since grown into the most important professional association of science and technology studies scholars worldwide. 1981 to “stimulate communication, exchange and collaboration in the field of studies of science and technology”. In Asia several STS associations exist.
Australasia, Southeast and East Asia and Oceania. Amílcar Herrera and Jorge Sabato y Oscar Varsavsky in Argentina, José Leite Lopes in Brazil, Miguel Wionczek in Mexico, Francisco Sagasti in Peru, Máximo Halty Carrere in Uruguay and Marcel Roche in Venezuela. American Association for the History of Medicine. Social constructions are human created ideas, objects, or events created by a series of choices and interactions.
These interactions have consequences that change the perception that different groups of people have on these constructs. Some examples of social construction include class, race, money, and citizenship. The following also alludes to the notion that not everything is set, a circumstance or result could potentially be one way or the other. According to the article “What is Social Construction? Laura Flores, “Social construction work is critical of the status quo. X need not have existed, or need not be at all as it is.