Misinformation shared via popular media can influence public perception of science. Scientists can play an important role in correcting the spread of misinformation. Scientists should the science of digital media pdf aware of and prepared for common misinformation in their field. Technical experts can partner with experienced communicators to boost their message.
What role should scientist play in correcting bad science, fake science, and pseudoscience presented in popular media? Here, we present a case study based on fake documentaries and discuss effective social media strategies for scientists who want to engage with the public on issues of bad science, pseudoscience, and fake science. We identify two tracks that scientists can use to maximize the broad dissemination of corrective and educational content: that of an audience builder or an expert resource. Finally, we suggests that scientists familiarize themselves with common sources of misinformation within their field, so that they can be better able to respond quickly when factually inaccurate content begins to spread.
2015 Published by Elsevier Ltd. Who is the subject that connects: individuals, organizations, enterprises, schools, hospitals, countries, etc. Which characteristics or attributes are distinguished to describe the divide: income, education, age, geographic location, motivation, reason not to use, etc. How sophisticated is the usage: mere access, retrieval, interactivity, intensive and extensive in usage, innovative contributions, etc.
To what does the subject connect: fixed or mobile, Internet or telephony, digital TV, broadband, etc. Different authors focus on different aspects, which leads to a large variety of definitions of the digital divide. 216 different ways to define the digital divide. Each one of them seems equally reasonable and depends on the objective pursued by the analyst”. The digital divide measured in terms of bandwidth is not closing, but fluctuating up and down. Traditionally the nature of the divide has been measured in terms of the existing numbers of subscriptions and digital devices.
Given the increasing number of such devices, some have concluded that the digital divide among individuals has increasingly been closing as the result of a natural and almost automatic process. Others point to persistent lower levels of connectivity among women, racial and ethnic minorities, people with lower incomes, rural residents, and less educated people as evidence that addressing inequalities in access to and use of the medium will require much more than the passing of time. 2004 increased levels of inequality”. This is because a new kind of connectivity is never introduced instantaneously and uniformly to society as a whole at once, but diffuses slowly through social networks.